http://unitedfamilies.org/default.asp?contentID=13
Tuesday, November 25, 2008
More info on Traditional Marriage
Here is another site which advocates traditional marriage, and to which you can look for guidance and more information:
http://unitedfamilies.org/default.asp?contentID=13
http://unitedfamilies.org/default.asp?contentID=13
Monday, November 24, 2008
I again ask: Why does the behavior, if normal, and if legal, have to be ridiculous to the point of unacceptability?
Why the parades? Why the comedic costuming? Why the attacks and raids on churches and respectable institutions?
If a man and a woman would walk into a church or courthouse and kiss and fondle each other before a group of people, they would certainly be removed post haste. Why should same sex couples do it? Should this be an intimidating practice? I for one would not be intimidated, I would leave and call the authorities. I would demand justice be done. If justice would not be done, I would institute civil justice. There is no excuse for this behavior. None whatsoever.
If a man and a woman would walk into a church or courthouse and kiss and fondle each other before a group of people, they would certainly be removed post haste. Why should same sex couples do it? Should this be an intimidating practice? I for one would not be intimidated, I would leave and call the authorities. I would demand justice be done. If justice would not be done, I would institute civil justice. There is no excuse for this behavior. None whatsoever.
This is occurring in Massachussetts as a result of their Same Sex Marriage Permissiveness.
SET APART TO YAH
< Back home | Unsubscribe | rss | add to blog group | sign out
Set Apart Disciples
Last Updated:
Nov 10, 2008
Send Message
Instant Message
Email to a Friend
Unsubscribe
Invite to My Blog
Who Gives Kudos:
Infected By T (2)
Sponsored Links
2009 Ford® F-450 Pickup
New F-Series with an Available 6.4L Powerstroke® Turbo Diesel Engine.
FordVehicles.com/SuperDuty
Thursday, October 23, 2008
5:48 PM - What same-sex "marriage" has done to Massachusetts
Current mood: angry
Category: Religion and Philosophy
repost from
----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
From: Who Is The Morning Star?
Date: Oct 22, 2008 2:31 PM
What same-sex "marriage" has done to Massachusetts
It's far worse than most people realize
by Brian Camenker
[Note: As the debate on this issue rages in states across the country, most people are unaware of what's really happened here. Get ready for an eye-opener.)
Anyone who thinks that same-sex "marriage" is a benign eccentricity which won't affect the average person should consider what it has done in Massachusetts. It's become a hammer to force the acceptance and normalization of homosexuality on everyone. And this train is moving fast. What has happened so far is only the beginning.
On November 18, 2003, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court announced its Goodridge opinion, ruling that it was unconstitutional not to allow same-sex "marriage." Six months later, homosexual marriages began to be performed.
The public schools
The homosexual "marriage" onslaught in public schools across the state started soon after the November 2003, court decision.
* At my own children's high school there was a school-wide assembly to celebrate same-sex "marriage" in early December, 2003. It featured an array of speakers, including teachers at the school who announced that they would be "marrying" their same-sex partners and starting families either through adoption or artificial insemination. Literature on same-sex marriage – how it is now a normal part of society – was handed out to the students.
* Within months it was brought into the middle schools. In September, 2004, an 8th-grade teacher in Brookline, MA, told National Public Radio that the marriage ruling had opened up the floodgates for teaching homosexuality. "In my mind, I know that, ..OK, this is legal now.' If somebody wants to challenge me, I'll say, ..Give me a break. It's legal now,'" she told NPR. She added that she now discusses gay sex with her students as explicitly as she desires. For example, she said she tells the kids that lesbians can have vaginal intercourse using sex toys.
* By the following year it was in elementary school curricula. Kindergartners were given picture books telling them that same-sex couples are just another kind of family, like their own parents. In 2005, when David Parker of Lexington, MA – a parent of a kindergartner – strongly insisted on being notified when teachers were discussing homosexuality or transgenderism with his son, the school had him arrested and put in jail overnight.
Second graders at the same school were read a book, "King and King", about two men who have a romance and marry each other, with a picture of them kissing. When parents Rob and Robin Wirthlin complained, they were told that the school had no obligation to notify them or allow them to opt-out their child.
* In 2006 the Parkers and Wirthlins filed a federal Civil Rights lawsuit to force the schools to notify parents and allow them to opt-out their elementary-school children when homosexual-related subjects were taught. The federal judges dismissed the case.
The judges ruled that because same-sex marriage is legal in Massachusetts, the school actually had a duty to normalize homosexual relationships to children, and that schools have no obligation to notify parents or let them opt-out their children! Acceptance of homosexuality had become a matter of good citizenship!
Think about that: Because same-sex marriage is "legal", a federal judge has ruled that the schools now have a duty to portray homosexual relationships as normal to children, despite what parents think or believe!
* In 2006, in the elementary school where my daughter went to Kindergarten, the parents of a third-grader were forced to take their child out of school because a man undergoing a sex-change operation and cross-dressing was being brought into class to teach the children that there are now "different kinds of families." School officials told the mother that her complaints to the principal were considered "inappropriate behavior."
* Libraries have also radically changed. School libraries across the state, from elementary school to high school, now have shelves of books to normalize homosexual behavior and the lifestyle in the minds of kids, some of them quite explicit and even pornographic. Parents complaints are ignored or met with hostility.
Over the past year, homosexual groups have been using taxpayer money to distribute a large, slick hardcover book celebrating homosexual marriage titled "Courting Equality" into every school library in the state.
* It's become commonplace in Massachusetts schools for teachers to prominently display photos of their same-sex "spouses" and occasionally bring them to school functions. Both high schools in my own town now have principals who are "married" to their same-sex partners, whom they bring to school and introduce to the students.
* "Gay days" in schools are considered necessary to fight "intolerance" which may exist against same-sex relationships. Hundreds of high schools and even middle schools across the state now hold "gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender appreciation days". They "celebrate" homosexual marriage and move forward to other behaviors such as cross-dressing and transsexuality. In my own town, a school committee member recently announced that combating "homophobia" is now a top priority.
Once homosexuality has been normalized, all boundaries will come down. The schools are already moving on to normalizing transgenderism (including cross-dressing and sex changes). The state-funded Commission on Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgender Youth includes leaders who are transsexuals.
Public health
* The Commissioner of the Massachusetts Department of Public Health is "married" to another man. In 2007 he told a crowd of kids at a state-sponsored youth event that it's "wonderful being gay" and he wants to make sure there's enough HIV testing available for all of them.
* Since homosexual marriage became "legal" the rates of HIV / AIDS have gone up considerably in Massachusetts. This year public funding to deal with HIV/AIDS has risen by $500,000.
* Citing "the right to marry" as one of the "important challenges" in a place where "it's a great time to be gay", the Massachusetts Department of Public Health helped produce The Little Black Book, Queer in the 21st Century, a hideous work of obscene pornography which was given to kids at Brookline High School on April 30, 2005. Among other things, it gives "tips" to boys on how to perform oral sex on other males, masturbate other males, and how to "safely" have someone urinate on you for sexual pleasure. It also included a directory of bars in Boston where young men meet for anonymous sex.
Domestic violence
* Given the extreme dysfunctional nature of homosexual relationships, the Massachusetts Legislature has felt the need to spend more money every year to deal with skyrocketing homosexual domestic violence. This year $350,000 was budgeted, up $100,000 from last year.
Business
* All insurance in Massachusetts must now recognize same-sex "married" couples in their coverage. This includes auto insurance, health insurance, life insurance, etc.
* Businesses must recognize same-sex "married" couples in all their benefits, activities, etc., regarding both employees and customers.
* The wedding industry is required serve the homosexual community if requested. Wedding photographers, halls, caterers, etc., must do same-sex marriages or be arrested for discrimination.
* Businesses are often "tested" for tolerance by homosexual activists. Groups of homosexual activists often go into restaurants or bars and publicly kiss and fondle each other to test whether the establishment demonstrates sufficient "equality" — now that homosexual marriage is "legal". In fact, more and more overt displays of homosexual affection are seen in public places across the state to reinforce "marriage equality".
Legal profession
* The Massachusetts Bar Exam now tests lawyers on their knowledge of same-sex "marriage" issues. In 2007, a Boston man, Stephen Dunne, failed the Massachusetts bar exam because he refused to answer the questions in it about homosexual marriage.
* Issues regarding homosexual "families" are now firmly entrenched in the Massachusetts legal system. In many firms, lawyers in Massachusetts practicing family law must now attend seminars on homosexual "marriage". There are also now several homosexual judges overseeing the Massachusetts family courts.
Adoption of children to homosexual "married" couples
* Homosexual "married" couples can now demand to be able to adopt children the same as normal couples. Catholic Charities decided to abandon handling adoptions rather submit to regulations requiring them to allow homosexuals to adopt the children in their care.
* In 2006 the Massachusetts Department of Social Services (DSS) honored two men "married" to each other as their "Parents of the Year". The men already adopted a baby through DSS (against the wishes of the baby's birth parents). According to news reports, the day after that adoption was final DSS approached the men about adopting a second child. Homosexuals now appear to be put in line for adopting children ahead of heterosexual parents by state agencies in Massachusetts.
Government mandates
* In 2004, Governor Mitt Romney ordered Justices of the Peace to perform homosexual marriages when requested or be fired. At least one Justice of the Peace decided to resign.
* Also thanks to Gov. Romney, marriage licenses in Massachusetts now have "Party A and Party B" instead of "husband and wife." Romney did not have a legal requirement to do this; he did it on his own. (See more on this below.)
* Since homosexual relationships are now officially "normal", the Legislature now gives enormous tax money to homosexual activist groups. In particular, the Massachusetts Commission on Gay Lesbian Bisexual and Transgender Youth is made up of the most radical and militant homosexual groups which target children in the schools. This year they are getting $700,000 of taxpayer money to go into the public schools.
* In 2008 Massachusetts changed the state Medicare laws to include homosexual "married" couples in the coverage.
The public square
* Since gay "marriage", annual gay pride parades have become more prominent. There are more politicians and corporations participating, and even police organizations take part. And the envelope gets pushed further and further. There is now a profane "Dyke March" through downtown Boston, and recently a "transgender" parade in Northampton that included bare-chested women who have had their breasts surgically removed so they could "become" men.
Governor Patrick even marched with his "out lesbian" 17-year old daughter in the 2008 Boston Pride event, right behind a "leather" group brandishing a black & blue flag, whips and chains!
The media
* Boston media, particularly the Boston Globe newspaper, regularly does feature stories and news stories portraying homosexual "married" couples where regular married couples would normally be used. It's "equal", they insist, so there must be no difference in the coverage. Also, the newspaper advice columns now deal with homosexual "marriage" issues, and how to properly accept it.
* A growing number of news reporters and TV anchors are openly "married" homosexuals who march in the "gay pride" parades.
Is gay marriage actually legal in Massachusetts?
Like everywhere else in America, the imposition of same-sex marriage on the people of Massachusetts was a combination of radical, arrogant judges and pitifully cowardly politicians.
The Goodridge ruling resulted in a complete cave-in by politicians of both parties on this issue. Same-sex "marriage" is still illegal in Massachusetts. On November 18, 2003 the court merely ruled that it was unconstitutional not to allow it, and gave the Legislature six months to "take such action as it may deem appropriate." Note that the Massachusetts Constitution strongly denies courts the power to make or change laws, or from ordering the other branches to take any action. The constitution effectively bans "judicial review" – a court changing or nullifying a law. Thus, the court did not order anything to happen; it simply rendered an opinion on that specific case. And the Legislature did nothing. The marriage statutes were never changed. However, against the advice of many, Gov. Romney took it upon himself to alter the state's marriage licenses to say "Party A and Party B" and order officials to perform same-sex "weddings" if asked, though he had no legal obligation to do so. Technically, same-sex marriages are still illegal in Massachusetts.
Nevertheless, we are having to live with it. And furthermore, this abdication of their proper constitutional roles by the Legislature and Governor has caused a domino effect as "copycat" rulings have been issued in California and Connecticut, with other states fearful it will happen there.
In conclusion
Homosexual "marriage" hangs over society like a hammer with the force of law. And it's only just begun.
It's pretty clear that the homosexual movement's obsession with marriage is not because large numbers of them actually want to marry each other. Research shows that homosexual relationships are fundamentally dysfunctional on many levels, and "marriage" as we know it isn't something they can achieve, or even desire. (In fact, over the last three months, the Sunday Boston Globe's marriage section hasn't had any photos of homosexual marriages. In the beginning it was full of them.) This is about putting the legal stamp of approval on homosexuality and imposing it with force throughout the various social and political institutions of a society that would never accept it otherwise. To the rest of America: You've been forewarned.
Special announcement:
Starting today, the MassResistance website will now be updated DAILY (Monday-Friday, and Saturday evening). We have an overwhelming number backlog of material, plus new things constantly happening.
Check it out!
This is your movement! Our funding comes from individuals.
Please donate - invest in MassResistance's efforts!
Donations can also be mailed to: MassResistance, PO Box 1612, Waltham, MA 02454
ALL donations are confidential. MassResistance does not sell or lend any of its lists.
Contact us if you want to get involved.
Also, check out the MassResistance blog (for even more in-depth coverage)!
Also, if this is being forwarded to you and you want to be on our primary list, please let us know!
< Back home | Unsubscribe | rss | add to blog group | sign out
Set Apart Disciples
Last Updated:
Nov 10, 2008
Send Message
Instant Message
Email to a Friend
Unsubscribe
Invite to My Blog
Who Gives Kudos:
Infected By T (2)
Sponsored Links
2009 Ford® F-450 Pickup
New F-Series with an Available 6.4L Powerstroke® Turbo Diesel Engine.
FordVehicles.com/SuperDuty
Thursday, October 23, 2008
5:48 PM - What same-sex "marriage" has done to Massachusetts
Current mood: angry
Category: Religion and Philosophy
repost from
----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
From: Who Is The Morning Star?
Date: Oct 22, 2008 2:31 PM
What same-sex "marriage" has done to Massachusetts
It's far worse than most people realize
by Brian Camenker
[Note: As the debate on this issue rages in states across the country, most people are unaware of what's really happened here. Get ready for an eye-opener.)
Anyone who thinks that same-sex "marriage" is a benign eccentricity which won't affect the average person should consider what it has done in Massachusetts. It's become a hammer to force the acceptance and normalization of homosexuality on everyone. And this train is moving fast. What has happened so far is only the beginning.
On November 18, 2003, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court announced its Goodridge opinion, ruling that it was unconstitutional not to allow same-sex "marriage." Six months later, homosexual marriages began to be performed.
The public schools
The homosexual "marriage" onslaught in public schools across the state started soon after the November 2003, court decision.
* At my own children's high school there was a school-wide assembly to celebrate same-sex "marriage" in early December, 2003. It featured an array of speakers, including teachers at the school who announced that they would be "marrying" their same-sex partners and starting families either through adoption or artificial insemination. Literature on same-sex marriage – how it is now a normal part of society – was handed out to the students.
* Within months it was brought into the middle schools. In September, 2004, an 8th-grade teacher in Brookline, MA, told National Public Radio that the marriage ruling had opened up the floodgates for teaching homosexuality. "In my mind, I know that, ..OK, this is legal now.' If somebody wants to challenge me, I'll say, ..Give me a break. It's legal now,'" she told NPR. She added that she now discusses gay sex with her students as explicitly as she desires. For example, she said she tells the kids that lesbians can have vaginal intercourse using sex toys.
* By the following year it was in elementary school curricula. Kindergartners were given picture books telling them that same-sex couples are just another kind of family, like their own parents. In 2005, when David Parker of Lexington, MA – a parent of a kindergartner – strongly insisted on being notified when teachers were discussing homosexuality or transgenderism with his son, the school had him arrested and put in jail overnight.
Second graders at the same school were read a book, "King and King", about two men who have a romance and marry each other, with a picture of them kissing. When parents Rob and Robin Wirthlin complained, they were told that the school had no obligation to notify them or allow them to opt-out their child.
* In 2006 the Parkers and Wirthlins filed a federal Civil Rights lawsuit to force the schools to notify parents and allow them to opt-out their elementary-school children when homosexual-related subjects were taught. The federal judges dismissed the case.
The judges ruled that because same-sex marriage is legal in Massachusetts, the school actually had a duty to normalize homosexual relationships to children, and that schools have no obligation to notify parents or let them opt-out their children! Acceptance of homosexuality had become a matter of good citizenship!
Think about that: Because same-sex marriage is "legal", a federal judge has ruled that the schools now have a duty to portray homosexual relationships as normal to children, despite what parents think or believe!
* In 2006, in the elementary school where my daughter went to Kindergarten, the parents of a third-grader were forced to take their child out of school because a man undergoing a sex-change operation and cross-dressing was being brought into class to teach the children that there are now "different kinds of families." School officials told the mother that her complaints to the principal were considered "inappropriate behavior."
* Libraries have also radically changed. School libraries across the state, from elementary school to high school, now have shelves of books to normalize homosexual behavior and the lifestyle in the minds of kids, some of them quite explicit and even pornographic. Parents complaints are ignored or met with hostility.
Over the past year, homosexual groups have been using taxpayer money to distribute a large, slick hardcover book celebrating homosexual marriage titled "Courting Equality" into every school library in the state.
* It's become commonplace in Massachusetts schools for teachers to prominently display photos of their same-sex "spouses" and occasionally bring them to school functions. Both high schools in my own town now have principals who are "married" to their same-sex partners, whom they bring to school and introduce to the students.
* "Gay days" in schools are considered necessary to fight "intolerance" which may exist against same-sex relationships. Hundreds of high schools and even middle schools across the state now hold "gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender appreciation days". They "celebrate" homosexual marriage and move forward to other behaviors such as cross-dressing and transsexuality. In my own town, a school committee member recently announced that combating "homophobia" is now a top priority.
Once homosexuality has been normalized, all boundaries will come down. The schools are already moving on to normalizing transgenderism (including cross-dressing and sex changes). The state-funded Commission on Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgender Youth includes leaders who are transsexuals.
Public health
* The Commissioner of the Massachusetts Department of Public Health is "married" to another man. In 2007 he told a crowd of kids at a state-sponsored youth event that it's "wonderful being gay" and he wants to make sure there's enough HIV testing available for all of them.
* Since homosexual marriage became "legal" the rates of HIV / AIDS have gone up considerably in Massachusetts. This year public funding to deal with HIV/AIDS has risen by $500,000.
* Citing "the right to marry" as one of the "important challenges" in a place where "it's a great time to be gay", the Massachusetts Department of Public Health helped produce The Little Black Book, Queer in the 21st Century, a hideous work of obscene pornography which was given to kids at Brookline High School on April 30, 2005. Among other things, it gives "tips" to boys on how to perform oral sex on other males, masturbate other males, and how to "safely" have someone urinate on you for sexual pleasure. It also included a directory of bars in Boston where young men meet for anonymous sex.
Domestic violence
* Given the extreme dysfunctional nature of homosexual relationships, the Massachusetts Legislature has felt the need to spend more money every year to deal with skyrocketing homosexual domestic violence. This year $350,000 was budgeted, up $100,000 from last year.
Business
* All insurance in Massachusetts must now recognize same-sex "married" couples in their coverage. This includes auto insurance, health insurance, life insurance, etc.
* Businesses must recognize same-sex "married" couples in all their benefits, activities, etc., regarding both employees and customers.
* The wedding industry is required serve the homosexual community if requested. Wedding photographers, halls, caterers, etc., must do same-sex marriages or be arrested for discrimination.
* Businesses are often "tested" for tolerance by homosexual activists. Groups of homosexual activists often go into restaurants or bars and publicly kiss and fondle each other to test whether the establishment demonstrates sufficient "equality" — now that homosexual marriage is "legal". In fact, more and more overt displays of homosexual affection are seen in public places across the state to reinforce "marriage equality".
Legal profession
* The Massachusetts Bar Exam now tests lawyers on their knowledge of same-sex "marriage" issues. In 2007, a Boston man, Stephen Dunne, failed the Massachusetts bar exam because he refused to answer the questions in it about homosexual marriage.
* Issues regarding homosexual "families" are now firmly entrenched in the Massachusetts legal system. In many firms, lawyers in Massachusetts practicing family law must now attend seminars on homosexual "marriage". There are also now several homosexual judges overseeing the Massachusetts family courts.
Adoption of children to homosexual "married" couples
* Homosexual "married" couples can now demand to be able to adopt children the same as normal couples. Catholic Charities decided to abandon handling adoptions rather submit to regulations requiring them to allow homosexuals to adopt the children in their care.
* In 2006 the Massachusetts Department of Social Services (DSS) honored two men "married" to each other as their "Parents of the Year". The men already adopted a baby through DSS (against the wishes of the baby's birth parents). According to news reports, the day after that adoption was final DSS approached the men about adopting a second child. Homosexuals now appear to be put in line for adopting children ahead of heterosexual parents by state agencies in Massachusetts.
Government mandates
* In 2004, Governor Mitt Romney ordered Justices of the Peace to perform homosexual marriages when requested or be fired. At least one Justice of the Peace decided to resign.
* Also thanks to Gov. Romney, marriage licenses in Massachusetts now have "Party A and Party B" instead of "husband and wife." Romney did not have a legal requirement to do this; he did it on his own. (See more on this below.)
* Since homosexual relationships are now officially "normal", the Legislature now gives enormous tax money to homosexual activist groups. In particular, the Massachusetts Commission on Gay Lesbian Bisexual and Transgender Youth is made up of the most radical and militant homosexual groups which target children in the schools. This year they are getting $700,000 of taxpayer money to go into the public schools.
* In 2008 Massachusetts changed the state Medicare laws to include homosexual "married" couples in the coverage.
The public square
* Since gay "marriage", annual gay pride parades have become more prominent. There are more politicians and corporations participating, and even police organizations take part. And the envelope gets pushed further and further. There is now a profane "Dyke March" through downtown Boston, and recently a "transgender" parade in Northampton that included bare-chested women who have had their breasts surgically removed so they could "become" men.
Governor Patrick even marched with his "out lesbian" 17-year old daughter in the 2008 Boston Pride event, right behind a "leather" group brandishing a black & blue flag, whips and chains!
The media
* Boston media, particularly the Boston Globe newspaper, regularly does feature stories and news stories portraying homosexual "married" couples where regular married couples would normally be used. It's "equal", they insist, so there must be no difference in the coverage. Also, the newspaper advice columns now deal with homosexual "marriage" issues, and how to properly accept it.
* A growing number of news reporters and TV anchors are openly "married" homosexuals who march in the "gay pride" parades.
Is gay marriage actually legal in Massachusetts?
Like everywhere else in America, the imposition of same-sex marriage on the people of Massachusetts was a combination of radical, arrogant judges and pitifully cowardly politicians.
The Goodridge ruling resulted in a complete cave-in by politicians of both parties on this issue. Same-sex "marriage" is still illegal in Massachusetts. On November 18, 2003 the court merely ruled that it was unconstitutional not to allow it, and gave the Legislature six months to "take such action as it may deem appropriate." Note that the Massachusetts Constitution strongly denies courts the power to make or change laws, or from ordering the other branches to take any action. The constitution effectively bans "judicial review" – a court changing or nullifying a law. Thus, the court did not order anything to happen; it simply rendered an opinion on that specific case. And the Legislature did nothing. The marriage statutes were never changed. However, against the advice of many, Gov. Romney took it upon himself to alter the state's marriage licenses to say "Party A and Party B" and order officials to perform same-sex "weddings" if asked, though he had no legal obligation to do so. Technically, same-sex marriages are still illegal in Massachusetts.
Nevertheless, we are having to live with it. And furthermore, this abdication of their proper constitutional roles by the Legislature and Governor has caused a domino effect as "copycat" rulings have been issued in California and Connecticut, with other states fearful it will happen there.
In conclusion
Homosexual "marriage" hangs over society like a hammer with the force of law. And it's only just begun.
It's pretty clear that the homosexual movement's obsession with marriage is not because large numbers of them actually want to marry each other. Research shows that homosexual relationships are fundamentally dysfunctional on many levels, and "marriage" as we know it isn't something they can achieve, or even desire. (In fact, over the last three months, the Sunday Boston Globe's marriage section hasn't had any photos of homosexual marriages. In the beginning it was full of them.) This is about putting the legal stamp of approval on homosexuality and imposing it with force throughout the various social and political institutions of a society that would never accept it otherwise. To the rest of America: You've been forewarned.
Special announcement:
Starting today, the MassResistance website will now be updated DAILY (Monday-Friday, and Saturday evening). We have an overwhelming number backlog of material, plus new things constantly happening.
Check it out!
This is your movement! Our funding comes from individuals.
Please donate - invest in MassResistance's efforts!
Donations can also be mailed to: MassResistance, PO Box 1612, Waltham, MA 02454
ALL donations are confidential. MassResistance does not sell or lend any of its lists.
Contact us if you want to get involved.
Also, check out the MassResistance blog (for even more in-depth coverage)!
Also, if this is being forwarded to you and you want to be on our primary list, please let us know!
Sunday, November 23, 2008
Video showing behavior of gays; very not normal.
This is a video about something which happened in ''Michigan in a church. I have a few questions about this incident, and also about what is shown before and after this incident. What about the incident itself? It shows two gays going to the front of a church, showing an act of public affection, and then throwing some papers around. Now if this way of life was normal, and they could be proud of it, why this obviously showy behavior in a church? Why the rowdiness? Why the distastefulness? Also the behavior which is shown before and after the incident shows the abnormal modes of dress adopted by participitators of this way of life, and why so obviously ridiculous if this way of life is a normal way of life?
Any answers to these questions? Please feel free to comment.
A Child's Dream.
Why does nobody like me? Why does it hurt whenever I see someone I like? I can't talk to anyone without having pains and I don't understand it. Why, when I ride my bike in front of a car, doesn't it hit me, it just beeps its horn at me.
I never want to go home, I just want to walk the streets. I suppose they want to know where I am, but that's okay, I don't want to tell them. I just like walking around.
There is nobody that I know who is home this afternoon. So I guess I will take a nap. But I can never sleep, so I will read. That will not work, someone will want to know what I am reading. I cannot stay home, so I will walk around.
If I didn't have school to go to, this life would really drag, you know it? There would be nothing to my life at all. I've got to keep going to school at all costs, whether I do well or not, I've got to stay in school. I have no friends, but I have to stay in school.
I hate that there are so many girls who talk about bad things, and boys as if they were really bad. I also hate the girls who talk about their bodies as if they were cheap. I don't think they should do that. I don't think they should play around either. They're really dumb.
I have no privacy. Everybody looks at my stuff, reads my mail, wants to know what I am doing what I am reading, writing, where I am going. I'm tired of it.
Goodnight.
I never want to go home, I just want to walk the streets. I suppose they want to know where I am, but that's okay, I don't want to tell them. I just like walking around.
There is nobody that I know who is home this afternoon. So I guess I will take a nap. But I can never sleep, so I will read. That will not work, someone will want to know what I am reading. I cannot stay home, so I will walk around.
If I didn't have school to go to, this life would really drag, you know it? There would be nothing to my life at all. I've got to keep going to school at all costs, whether I do well or not, I've got to stay in school. I have no friends, but I have to stay in school.
I hate that there are so many girls who talk about bad things, and boys as if they were really bad. I also hate the girls who talk about their bodies as if they were cheap. I don't think they should do that. I don't think they should play around either. They're really dumb.
I have no privacy. Everybody looks at my stuff, reads my mail, wants to know what I am doing what I am reading, writing, where I am going. I'm tired of it.
Goodnight.
Saturday, November 22, 2008
The Views of Others in My Circle of Friends.
I find it very interesting that since beginning this blog, I have had two people delete me from Myspace. But when I looked amongst my friend list, the ones who I thought had deleted me were still on there. So I must have offended someone whom I had not known would be offended by my ideas. I am learning a lot about people just by posting blogs.
I have friends on my networking sites who actually like reading my writings, even though they would be the first people I would think would be offended by them. Isn't it amazing how things can go?
I can remember after I ended my disastrous second marriage, and I was going to college at that time, and I went to my math class the morning my divorce was final, and expressed my relief at not having to deal with married life anymore, and immediately was approached by someone who wanted to be y friend, and move in with me and take up housekeeping with me, and let me take showers in this individual's house, and although I welcomed the friendship at first, it became stifling ultimately, and I just had to stay away from this person, who turned out to be gay, which was what I did not want, either. I did not want any kind of relationship at all.
So it can be both ways. One just needs enough space, and to just get to know people, and be onesself.
My circle of friends now is so variable; some are oriented toward causes, some are looking for lost children, missing adults, cures for diseases, justice for various crimes, there are many things out there that can be done and people are doing them. Those are the people who are in my circle of friends.
I have friends on my networking sites who actually like reading my writings, even though they would be the first people I would think would be offended by them. Isn't it amazing how things can go?
I can remember after I ended my disastrous second marriage, and I was going to college at that time, and I went to my math class the morning my divorce was final, and expressed my relief at not having to deal with married life anymore, and immediately was approached by someone who wanted to be y friend, and move in with me and take up housekeeping with me, and let me take showers in this individual's house, and although I welcomed the friendship at first, it became stifling ultimately, and I just had to stay away from this person, who turned out to be gay, which was what I did not want, either. I did not want any kind of relationship at all.
So it can be both ways. One just needs enough space, and to just get to know people, and be onesself.
My circle of friends now is so variable; some are oriented toward causes, some are looking for lost children, missing adults, cures for diseases, justice for various crimes, there are many things out there that can be done and people are doing them. Those are the people who are in my circle of friends.
Tuesday, November 18, 2008
It takes a union between a man and a woman to produce a child.
"In order to produce children, which was what marriage was ordained for, it takes a female egg and a male sperm. It cannot be done any other way.
When I moved to the town I live in now, I had the opportunity to meet two women who were together in a mobile home, one who had a baby. I asked which of them was the mother of the baby, and one of them said that they were co-parenting it; raising it together. I didn't pursue the question further, having previously lived in an area where that topic was descriptive of many very visible situations. I found it tasteless to discuss it.
But what happens when that child reaches the age of mandatory education? When forms have to be filled out, asking about the mother and the father. When little children ask each other about daddies and mommies. How does a child say that he or she has two mommies or two daddies? Do you see how complicated this gets?
I see it all the time on TV, and it is depicted in comedy situations, two men and a boy, in all kinds of family situations, but it just is not funny to me, because I know that a child should not be living like this. I want everybody to feel free to respond with your true feelings about what I have written.
Thank you for reading this.
When I moved to the town I live in now, I had the opportunity to meet two women who were together in a mobile home, one who had a baby. I asked which of them was the mother of the baby, and one of them said that they were co-parenting it; raising it together. I didn't pursue the question further, having previously lived in an area where that topic was descriptive of many very visible situations. I found it tasteless to discuss it.
But what happens when that child reaches the age of mandatory education? When forms have to be filled out, asking about the mother and the father. When little children ask each other about daddies and mommies. How does a child say that he or she has two mommies or two daddies? Do you see how complicated this gets?
I see it all the time on TV, and it is depicted in comedy situations, two men and a boy, in all kinds of family situations, but it just is not funny to me, because I know that a child should not be living like this. I want everybody to feel free to respond with your true feelings about what I have written.
Thank you for reading this.
Monday, November 17, 2008
Maybe we should talk now about the fact that two of the same sex cannot produce a child.
Why is it not natural for two men or two woman to be together. Because God, in Hid wisdom, created the reproduction act to be between the man and the woman. There is no way that two men or two woman can produce a child naturally. I do understand that there is a man in the United States who has produced a child, and is pregnant again, but he is married to a woman, so how did he get pregnant? That has not been told to me, at least. I just don't understand how the sexes have gotten so messed up and how this has gotten so out of hand.
Let us not even talk about the fact that two of the same sex can't produce.
That is obvious, but there adoption possibilities, so they can argue that point, making it just sort of moot to even bring it up.
However, one thing has caught my attention whenever I have seen two women together, and that is one has to be dressed like a man. Now why is that? Can't they both be feminine? What is wrong with two girls just being friends and both wearing a dress and walking down the street? Why does one have to be dressed like a man in a woman to woman same sex relationship? And in the case of men, one can see that there is always one man who is masculinely dressed, and the other one is either effeminately dressed, or ambivalently attired. Now what is this? You don't see two male friends who are just male friends doing this, just in one of these same sex relationships. I just can't figure it out, if same sex relationships are so on the up and up, why can't they be proud to be of the same sex, not pretend to be of the other sex?
Very disturbing.
However, one thing has caught my attention whenever I have seen two women together, and that is one has to be dressed like a man. Now why is that? Can't they both be feminine? What is wrong with two girls just being friends and both wearing a dress and walking down the street? Why does one have to be dressed like a man in a woman to woman same sex relationship? And in the case of men, one can see that there is always one man who is masculinely dressed, and the other one is either effeminately dressed, or ambivalently attired. Now what is this? You don't see two male friends who are just male friends doing this, just in one of these same sex relationships. I just can't figure it out, if same sex relationships are so on the up and up, why can't they be proud to be of the same sex, not pretend to be of the other sex?
Very disturbing.
This blog is about the importance of defining a marriage as a union between a man and a woman.
For the sake of our children. For the sake of the furtherance of Christian values. For the sake of the future health of society. It has to be this way.
I will elaborate more in the future. Please feel free to comment.
Thank you.
I will elaborate more in the future. Please feel free to comment.
Thank you.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)